Top ten things to "do" when critiquing from the critiquee's Point of View.
  1. Have at least 100 pages completed before asking for critiques. First chapters generally have problems, and if only one chapter is written, then it's a little too easy to give up on a story after getting a critique--when it may very well be a good story. Having 100 pages gives stability to the review. Did you know Margaret Mitchell had a working draft of Gone With The Wind, but couldn't figure out an opening chapter, so about the first half of the book as we know it is failed attempts adding chapters to the front end to find a point of beginning.
  2. Proofread the work for typos and punctuation problems. Nothing is worse than getting a typo-ridden manuscript. Typos are a distraction to writers when they switch to reading the content for a critique.
  3. Expect to be critiqued. The purpose of a critique is to find ways to improve the story and identify any weaknesses in the skill areas. The purpose of a critique is to improve instead of making cooing noises and nice praise.
  4. Stay away from alcohol before the critique session and during. Alcohol and critiques are a very bad mixture. Potato chips and cookies are okay (even if they are fattening).
  5. When receiving a critique, resist the urge--and sometimes this is really hard!--to defend the work. Remember, the critiquing reader see it like the agent or publisher will see it without having the writer standing by to explain this or that. All they have is what's on the page, and if a reader is finding that unclear, it's a clear sign that more work is needed.
  6. Ask questions to help clarify what a critiquer says.
  7. If two or more people say that they have the same problem--such as too many characters--then that's a big sign that more work is needed.
  8. Weigh each comment individually for its value to the story. Some will be appropriate and helpful, while others won't be. No matter how prestigious or important the critiquer is, such as a teacher or a published writer, what's best for the story should always come first.
  9. Make revisions to the manuscript and try to make improvements. It is annoying to a critiquer to receive the same piece back for critique and find that only superficial changes.
  10. Critique the work of others. Too many want the critique but don't want to put the effort in to give one. But the true learning often takes place during this part of the process. The best way to learn is to teach.

 

 HomeBlog  |  Critique Group  |  About Thriller

Linda Adams | Emory Hackman

© 2001-2008 Emory Hackman and Linda Adams